Ann Clin Microbiol 2021;24:83-96. Evaluation of Five Automated Urine Analyzers as Screening Instruments for Enhancing Diagnostic Efficiency in Urinary Tract Infection

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study subjects
Characteristic Analyzer Male (n = 307) Female (n = 203) P-value§
Age (yr) 59 (43-70) 61 (46-71) 0.985
Significant bacteriuria 23 (7.5) 48 (23.6) < 0.001*
WBC (/µL) UF-5000 2.50 (1.00-7.85) 4.60 (1.30-17.40) 0.539
UAS800 1.10 (0.00-6.44) 3.30 (0.00-10.56) 0.034*
Cobas®u701 1.98 (0.00-6.44) 3.96 (1.32-13.86) 0.096
iQ®200SPRINT 5.56 (0.00-11.12) 5.56 (0.00-17.60) 0.441
URiSCAN®PlusScope 0.22 (0.00-2.05) 2.05 (0.00-6.15) 0.440
Bacteria (/µL)†,‡ UF-1000i 8.20 (3.10-27.30) 15.50 (5.10-107.80) 0.021*
UF-5000 2.30 (1.10-8.00) 8.00 (2.30-63.50) 0.020*
UAS800 125.40 (58.19-207.40) 110.00 (55.88-211.64) 0.963
iQ®200SPRINT (ASP) 1166.50 (471.75-2914.25) 927.00 (463.00-2478.00) 0.162

Values are presented as median (IQR) or number (%).
*P-value < 0.05 represents statistical significance.
For bacteria count, the UF-1000i was also evaluated as a reference analyzer for comparison.
The Cobas® u701 and URiSCAN® PlusScope did not display the quantitative bacterial counts when our experiment was conducted. The iQ®200SPRINT provided ASP values instead of bacterial counts.
§The P-value stands for the statistical difference between genders.
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; WBC, white blood cell; ASP, all small particle.