Young Sun Joo1, Na Eun Kwak2, Gun Han Kim3, Eun-Jeong Yoon4, Seok Hoon Jeong4
1Department of Clnical Pathology, Sangji University College of Science, Wonju, 2BioPark Diagnostics Inc., 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, 4Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Background: Pulmonary infection with nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is increasing in South Korea. Since treatment strategy differs by NTM species, accurate identification is necessary. In this study, using Mycobacterium pulmonary isolates recently recovered from a general hospital in Seoul, the prevalence of NTM isolates was investigated.
Methods: A total of 483 Mycobacterium pulmonary strains isolated between May and November 2018 from an 814-bed general hospital in South Korea were analyzed. Bacterial species were identified based on nucleotide sequences of the 16S-23S rDNA internal transcribed spacer and the rpoB gene.
Results: From a total of 1,209 pulmonary specimens from patients suspected to be infected with mycobacteria, 324 deduplicate strains were isolated, comprising 90 Mycobacteriumtuberculosis and 229 NTM strains. Among the NTM isolates, 61.5% (n=144) were Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), including 92 M. avium and 52 Mycobacterium intracellulare, while 8.1% (n=19) represented Mycobacterium abscessus, including 10 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and 9 M. abscessus subsp. massiliense. In addition, 12 (5.1%) Mycobacterium lentiflavum, 12 (5.1%) Mycobacterium gordonae, 6 (2.6%) Mycobacteriumkansasii, and 5 (2.1%) Mycobacteriumfortuitum were identified. In addition, Mycobacteriummucogenicum (n=2), Mycobacterium septicum (n=1), Mycobacterium colombiens (n=1), Mycobacterium asiaticum (n=1), and Mycobacteriumcelatum (n=1) were identified.
Conclusion: Among the recently recovered Mycobacterium pulmonary strains, more than half were identified as NTM, and MAC was the most prevalent NTM, followed by M. abcessuss. (Ann Clin Microbiol 2019;22:71-76)
Keywords
Non-tuberculosis mycobacteria, Pulmonary specimen, Species identification