Fig. 2. Antimicrobial resistance of group A streptococci against erythromycin (ERY), clindamycin (CLI), tetracycline (TET), and ofloxacin (OFX) isolated from Gyeongnam Province between 1995-2017.
Ann Clin Microbiol 2023;26:89-97. Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance of group A streptococci infections
Serotyping of group A streptococci by (a) T typing and (b) M typing.
Ann Clin Microbiol 2023;26:89-97. Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance of group A streptococci infections
Fig. 2. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the biomarkers evaluated in the present study. (a) ROC for predicting Gram negative bacteremia. (b) ROC for predicting Gram positive bacteremia. AUC, area under the curve; hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; BUN, blood urea nitrogen
Ann Clin Microbiol 2023;26:103-115. Clinical usefulness of procalcitonin/albumin and blood urea nitrogen/albumin ratios for the early detection of bacteremia
Fig. 1. Flow chart of research samples
Ann Clin Microbiol 2023;26:103-115. Clinical usefulness of procalcitonin/albumin and blood urea nitrogen/albumin ratios for the early detection of bacteremia
Fig. 3. Residual biofilm percentage after treatment of study detergents. The percentage OD620 after treatment divided by baseline OD620 before detergent treatment was expressed in gray scale with shaded box for the corresponding range. The shade and biofilm removal of each well were inversely correlated. The study detergents included two enzymatic cleaners EmpowerTM (Metrex, Orange, CA), CidezymeTM (Johnson and Johnson Medical Inc, Arlington, TX), one non-enzymatic cleaner Matrix mintTM (Whiteley Medical, Sydney, Australia). A chlorine bleach YuhanroxTM Regular (Yuhanclorox, Seoul, Korea) was also tested as a control. Abbreviations: DW, distilled water; RT, room temperature.
Ann Clin Microbiol 2023;26:117-124. Evaluation of the efficacy of three medical device detergents on bacteria and yeast derived biofilm: a comparative study
Fig. 2. Biofilm formation of S. aureus RN9120 in response to alcohol and salt supplement. The standard errors of OD620 of triplicated experiments were expressed as error bars. * denoted statistically significance.
Ann Clin Microbiol 2023;26:117-124. Evaluation of the efficacy of three medical device detergents on bacteria and yeast derived biofilm: a comparative study
Fig. 1. Quantification of biofilm formation of each strains among gram-negative rods (A) and gram-positive cocci and yeasts (B) using measuring optical density of crystal violet stained biomass at 620 nm. The standard errors are expressed as error bars. The strains marked with asterisks are submitted to the evaluation of biofilm removal. Type strain names were shaded and the strains derived from clinical isolates were given names starting with AMC.
Ann Clin Microbiol 2023;26:117-124. Evaluation of the efficacy of three medical device detergents on bacteria and yeast derived biofilm: a comparative study
Fig. 3. The time to positivity (TTP) of aerobic and anaerobic bottles among six most frequent organisms. Each of the white and black arrow heads denoted T50 of aerobic bottles and anaerobic bottles, respectively. The TTP for P. aeruginosa displayed only for aerobic bottles. CNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; T50, median time-to-positivity.
Ann Clin Microbiol 2023;26:125-137. Performance evaluation of 4-day versus 5-day blood cultures using the BD BACTEC FX system
Fig. 2. Number of isolates by time to positivity in aerobic and anaerobic bottles. The white, black, and gray arrow head denoted T50 of aerobic bottles, anaerobic bottles, both bottles, respectively. T50, median time-to-positivity.
Ann Clin Microbiol 2023;26:125-137. Performance evaluation of 4-day versus 5-day blood cultures using the BD BACTEC FX system
Fig. 1. Cumulative percentages of positive blood cultures according to time-to-positivity.
Ann Clin Microbiol 2023;26:125-137. Performance evaluation of 4-day versus 5-day blood cultures using the BD BACTEC FX system