Annals of Clinical Microbiology, The official Journal of the Korean Society of Clinical Microbiology

6

Weeks in Review

4

Weeks to Publication
Indexed in KCI, KoreaMed, Synapse, DOAJ
Open Access, Peer Reviewed
pISSN 2288-0585 eISSN 2288-6850

Table 1. Literature review of Carnobacterium bacteremia

Ann Clin Microbiol 2020;23:149-153. Isolation of Carnobacterium divergens from Blood Culture in Korea : A Case Report and Literature Review Download table Authors (year) Sex/Age Diagnosis Suspected route of infection Specimen Method Identification XU et al. (1997) [5] F/13 Finger necrosis Contamination from pool water Finger gangrene API 20ASystem 16S rRNA sequencing Carnobacterium species Chmelar […]

Table 6. Estimated identification results of ASTA MicroIDSys compared to the strains reported by Bruker Biotyper over the past five years

Ann Clin Microbiol 2020;23:135-148. Evaluation of the Performance of ASTA MicroIDSys, a Novel Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry System, in Identification of Bacterial Clinical Isolates Download table Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Reported strains 18,117 19,617 18,328 18,684 20,406 13,099 108,251 Estimated number of matched report (%) Genus level 18,107 […]

Table 5. List of bacterial identification differences between ASTA MicroIDSys and Bruker Biotyper

Ann Clin Microbiol 2020;23:135-148. Evaluation of the Performance of ASTA MicroIDSys, a Novel Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry System, in Identification of Bacterial Clinical Isolates Download table Group Reference identification   ASTA MicroIDSys   Bruker Biotyper Results ID score   Results ID score Enterobacterales Enterobacter asburiae   Enterobacter cloacae† 220   Enterobacter asburiae […]

Table 4. Comparison of bacterial identification between ASTA MicroIDSys and Bruker Biotyper for 88 other isolates

Ann Clin Microbiol 2020;23:135-148. Evaluation of the Performance of ASTA MicroIDSys, a Novel Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry System, in Identification of Bacterial Clinical Isolates Download table Reference identification (number of isolates) ASTA MicroIDSys, number of isolates   Bruker Biotyper, number of isolates Correctly identified Mis-ID Invalid-ID   Correctly identified Mis-ID Invalid-ID Genus […]

Table 3. Comparison of bacterial identification between ASTA MicroIDSys and Bruker Biotyper for 216 Gram-positive cocci isolates

Ann Clin Microbiol 2020;23:135-148. Evaluation of the Performance of ASTA MicroIDSys, a Novel Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry System, in Identification of Bacterial Clinical Isolates Download table Reference identification (number of isolates) ASTA MicroIDSys, number of isolates   Bruker Biotyper, number of isolates Correctly identified Mis-ID Invalid-ID   Correctly identified Mis-ID Invalid-ID Genus […]

Table 2. Comparison of bacterial identification between ASTA MicroIDSys and Bruker Biotyper for 167 glucose non-fermenting bacilli isolates

Ann Clin Microbiol 2020;23:135-148. Evaluation of the Performance of ASTA MicroIDSys, a Novel Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry System, in Identification of Bacterial Clinical Isolates Download table Reference identification (number of isolates) ASTA MicroIDSys, number of isolates   Bruker Biotyper, number of isolates Correctly identified Mis-ID Invalid-ID   Correctly identified Mis-ID Invalid-ID Genus […]

Table 1. Comparison of bacterial identification between ASTA MicroIDSys and Bruker Biotyper for 418 Enterobacterales isolates

Ann Clin Microbiol 2020;23:135-148. Evaluation of the Performance of ASTA MicroIDSys, a Novel Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry System, in Identification of Bacterial Clinical Isolates Download table Reference identification (number of isolates) ASTA MicroIDSys, number of isolates   Bruker Biotyper, number of isolates Correctly identified Mis-ID Invalid-ID   Correctly identified Mis-ID Invalid-ID Genus […]

Table 3. Summary of discrepancies in 13 strains showing discrepant results between modified-EUCAST rapid direct and conventional ASTs

Ann Clin Microbiol 2020;23:125-134. Performance of Modified-EUCAST Rapid Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing on Clinical Urine Samples Download table Species Antimicrobial agent Modified-EUCAST rapid direct AST Conventional AST MIC by E-test (μg/ml) Interpretation Escherichia coli Aztreonam R S 0.5 ME Escherichia coli Cefepime R S 4 MnE Escherichia coli Cefepime R S 8 MnE Escherichia coli […]